Transformation of the Open Adoption Practice in the Context of Rural-Urban Migration (Case of Post-Soviet Buryatiya)

Abstract: 
The article deals with the transformation of the practice of open adoption in post-Soviet Buryatiya. The transfer of the child or the “exchange” of children within the extended family is considered by the author of the article as another form of childcare that allows to transfer the “burden” of care from one generation to another or to redistribute it in-between representatives of the same generation. This type of intergenerational care is rarely become the subject of research, since the open adoption of children of relatives is the norm in a limited number of societies. The study was conducted within the framework of qualitative methodology. The method of the leitmotif interview was used to collect empirical material (23 interviews); the method of thematic coding and the method of discourse analysis were used for the analysis of documents. The technique of analyzing the categorization of interaction was used in the analysis of interview transcripts. An analysis of the public discourse of the tradition of open adoption shows that this custom is positively interpreted. The custom of open adoption becomes in demand as a legitimate way to level out the lack of care in the family of a rural migrant. If earlier the need for adoption was legitimized by shamanistic faith in the life of ancestral spirits on the earth, today Buddhism justifies parents who give their children away for adoption with the concept of “buin”. The custom of open adoption is encouraged at the level of public discourse, but stigmatized in private area. A change in the attitude towards this custom in the private sphere shows that the extended mothering that was adopted in the families of the 19 th century and the beginning of the 20 th century, when women of one large family participated in the childcare, is replaced by the ideology of intensive mothering.

For citation: Galindabaeva V.V. Transformation of the Open Adoption Practice in the Context of Rural-Urban Migration (Case of Post-Soviet Buryatiya). St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2018. N. 10. P. 149-168. DOI: 10.25990/socinstras.pss-10.amjz-s332

References: 
  • England P. Emerging Theories of Care Work // Annual Review of Sociol­ogy. Vol. 31. 2005. P. 381-399.
  • Filipps L., Jorgensen M. V. Diskurs analiz: teoriya i mesto [Discourse analysis: theory and place]. — Har’kov: Gumanitarnyj centr. 2008. — 354 p. (in Russian).
  • Gabysheva V. Zhitel’nica Brnyatii prosit pomoshchi [A resident of Buryatia asks for help] // Gazeta «Inform-Polis» [Newspaper “Inform-Polis”]. 19.10. 2011. [The Electronic resource]. Data of visit: 29.07.2016. URL: https://www. infpol.ru/133205-zhitelnitsa-buryatii-prosit-pomoshchi/ (in Russian).
  • Hartmann H. C. The Family as the Locus of Gender, Class, and Political Struggle: The Example of Housework // Signs. Vol. 6. № 3. 1981. P. 366-394.
  • Hochschild A. The Commodity Frontier // Self, Social Structure and Beliefs: Essays in Sociology / ed. by J. Alexander, G. Marx, C. Williams. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press, 2004. P. 38-56.
  • Hochschild A. The Culture of Politics: Traditional, Postmodern, Cold-Mod­ern, and Warm-Modern Ideals of Care // Social Politics. Vol. 2. № 3. 1995. P. 331-347.
  • Hodorov N. Psihodinamika sem’i [Psychodynamics of the Family] // Hres- tomatiya feministskih tekstov [Reader of feminist texts] E. Zdravomyslova, A. Temkina (eds.). — SPb.: Izd. Dmitrij Bulanin, 2000. P. 161-162 (in Russian).
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo H., Avila E. “I’m Here, but I’m There”: the Meanings of Latina Transnational Motherhood // Gender and Society. Vol. 11. № 5. 1997. P. 548-571.
  • Hudozhnik [Painter] // Ezhednevnaya obshchestvenno-politicheskaya gazeta «Buryatiya» [The daily social and political newspaper “Buryatiya”]. 31.07.2008.   P. 2 (in Russian).
  • Lebedeva A. A. Sem’ya i semejnyj byt Zabajkal’ya [Family and family life of Transbaikalia] // Byt i iskusstvo russkogo naseleniya Vostochnoj Sibiri [Life and art of the Russian population of Eastern Siberia]. — Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1975. P. 81-101 (in Russian).
  • Narodnyj poet Damba Zhalsaraev [People’s poet Damba Zhalsaraev] // Tradiciya [Tradition]. 19 March 2009. P. 3 (in Russian).
  • Novyj byt v sovremennoj Rossii: gendernye issledovaniya povsednevnosti [New everyday life in contemporary Russia: gender studies of dayly life] / Pod. red. E. Zdravomyslovoi, A. Rotkirh, A. Temkinoi. SPb.: EUSPb, 2009. — 524 p. (in Russian).
  • Oakley A. Women’s Work: the Housewife, Past and Present. New York: Pantheon Books, 1974. — 275 p.
  • Rubin G. The Traffic in Women: “Political Economy” of Sex // Toward an Anthropology of Women / ed. by R. Reiter. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975. P. 157-210.
  • Slezkin Yu. Arkticheskie zerkala. Rossiya i malye narody Severa [Arctic mirrors. Russia and small peoples of the North]. — M.: NLO, 2008-512 p. (in Russian).
  • Terrell J., Model J. Anthropology and Adoption // American Anthropologist. Vol. 96. № 1. 1994. P. 155-161.
  • Verhoef H. A. Child has Many Mothers: Views of Child Fostering in North­western Cameroon // Childhood. Vol. 12. № 3. 2005. P. 369-390.
  • Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. Kategorizaciya vzaimodejstvij: konstru- irovanie identichnosti v seksual’noj sfere [Categorization of interaction: the construction of identity in the sexual sphere] // [Rossijskij gendernyj poryadok: sociologicheskie podhody Russian gender order: sociological approaches] E. Zdravomyslova, A. Temkina (eds.). — SPb.: Izd-vo Evropejskogo universi- teta v S.-Peterburge, 2007. P. 250-265 (in Russian).
  • Zhapova Ya. Teplo i lasku — ne po raspisaniyu [Warmth and affection — not in accordance with the schedule] // Ezhednevnaya obshchestvenno-politicheska- ya gazeta «Buryatiya» [The daily social and political newspaper “Buryatiya”]. 24 fevralya 2011. P. 2 (in Russian).
  • Zurhaj ot Zundy lamy s 5 po 11 fevralya [Zurhay from the Zundy Lama from 5 to 11 February] // Gazeta «Nomer odin» [Newspaper “Number One”].