Factors of Ecoactivism

Abstract: 
Two factors of Eco activism are considered in the article: 1) personal traits related to socio- demographic characteristics and 2) attitudes and values; also shows the spread of eco-activism both in Russia and in the world as a whole. The dependence between Eco activism and the level of education is revealed: among Eco activists there are more people with higher education. It was expected that the representatives of this group — as a whole are more financially secure than the rest of the survey participants. Among Eco activists, there are more than those who refer themselves to the middle class, upper middle class and even the upper class. The leaders in environmental activity were the Volga and Siberia, which occupy the lowest lines of Russia’s environmental rating. In the course of the study, the hypothesis of “objective problems and subjective values” of R. Inglehart was confirmed: it was revealed that Eco activists are recruited, firstly, among residents of regions where there are objective environmental problems, and secondly, at the expense of the inhabitants of megacities that demonstrate a greater commitment to post-materialistic values.

For citation: Geger A.E., Geger S.A. Factors of Ecoactivism. St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2018. N. 10. P. 65-76. DOI: 10.25990/socinstras.pss-10.cbap-7544

References: 
  • Golbraykh V. B. Ekologicheskie obshchestvennye iniciativy v Internete kak novaya praktika politicheskogo uchastiya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarst- vennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2016. № 4 (36). S. 340-350.
  • Inglehart R., Welzel K. (2011) Modernizaciya, kul’turnye izmeneniya i     demokratiya. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2011.
  • Botetzagias I., Jones N., Malesios C. Petitioner, contributor, protester. The profile of Europeans performing different ‘public-sphere’ pro-environmental behaviours // Green European: Environmental Behaviour and Attitudes in Europe in a Historical and Cross-Cultural Comparative Perspective (Studies in European Sociology) / Ed. by Audrone Telesiene & Matthias Gross. Routledge, 2017. P. 162-183.
  • Freymeyer R. H. and Johnson B E. A cross-cultural investigation of factors influencing environmental actions // Sociological Spectrum. 2010. Vol. 30, No. 2. P. 184-195.
  • Greenspan I., Handy F. andKatz-Gerro T. Environmental philanthropy: is it similar to other types of environmental behavior? // Organization & Envi­ronment. 2012. Vol. 25, No. 2. P. 111-130.
  • Inglehart R. Public support for environmental protection: objective prob­lems and subjective values in 43 societies // Political Science and Politics. 1995. 28 (1). P. 57-72.
  • Mohai P Men, women, and the environment: an examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism // Society and Natural Resources. 1992. Vol. 5, No. 1. P. 1-19.
  • Olofsson A, Ohman S. General beliefs and environmental concern: transat­lantic comparisons // Environment & Behavior. 2006. Vol. 38, No. 6. P. 768-790.
  • Stern P. C. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of en­vironmentally significant behavior // Journal of Social Issues. 2000. Vol. 56, No. 3. P. 407-424.
  • Tindall, D. B., Davies S. and Mauboules C. Activism and conservation behaviour in an environmental movement: the contradictory effects of gender // Society and Natural Resources. 2003. Vol. 16, No. 10. P. 909-932.