Environmental Policy of China and Russia: first steps towards the formation of anti-risk national behavior

Abstract: 
Environmental problems around the world often turn out to be technogenic and social challenges. Russia and China are among the countries where these problems are extremely acute, as evidenced by the positions of both ones in international ratings. The authors compares the directions implemented by these countries in the field of environmental policy. The main task is to maintain a balance of interests of all its subjects and develop anti-risk national behavior in most countries of the world. As a methodological basis for analyzing the achievements of Chinese and Russian environmental policy, the theory of environmental modernization is used, which allows to evaluate systematically innovations that determine the social component in each country, designating the main as change in the consciousness of each person. The analysis showed that both countries are on the transition to a qualitatively new stage: the transformation of consumer behavior into a “responsible” one that meets the requirements of world environmental policy. But they have not yet been able to achieve the indicators of international ratings of developed countries. Although, on the whole, in terms of “natural” indicators, Russia’s place is slightly higher than China’s, but all indicators are below the average level. Environmental concerns have become part of national policies in both countries, as evidenced by noticeable positive developments in environmental performance. However, the observed passivity from the side of public control predetermines the lack of success in both countries, preventing their governments from fully realizing their potential. The severity of the problem urgently requires the inclusion of government agencies, enterprises, charitable organizations and each person.
edn: 
ZHDIVS

For citation: Eremicheva G.V., Menshikova G.A., Puyang Yao Environmental Policy of China and Russia: first steps towards the formation of anti-risk national behavior. St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2023. N. 20. P. 28-44. DOI:10.25990/socinstras.pss-20.kwpk-5442

References: 
  • Aksenova O. V. Development of environmental policy in Russia. Institutionalization of environmental policy in Russia: social practices, state strategy, management decisions. Ed. by I. A. Khaliy. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.)
  • Antonio Guterres. Climate action for people and planet: the time is now. Independent Newspaper, 2021, April 21. (In Russ.)
  • Buttel F. Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum 31. Pergamon, Elsevier Science Ltd., 2000.
  • China Modernization Report Outlook (2001-2010). Ed. He Chuanqi, transl. from English. Ed. by N. I. Lapin. Moscow, The whole World, 2011. (In Russ.)
  • He С., Zhang F. National Innovation System: Engine of Second Modernization (Chinese edition). Beijing, High Education Press, 1999, p. 127.
  • He C. Second Modernization: Inspiration From Human Civilization Process (Chinese edition). Beijing, High Education Press, 1999, p. 256.
  • Huber J. Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. J. Environ. Policy & Planning, 2020, no 2, pp. 269-285.
  • Jiang W. China’s environmental issues in a global context. Seeing Red China, 2012, no 7, March, pp. 1-3.
  • Kudinova G. E., Rosenberg G. S. Comparative analysis of ecological modernization in China and Russia. Izvestiya Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012, vol. 14, no 1 (9), pp. 2423-2430. (In Russ.)
  • Kulyasov I. P. Stages of development of the theory of ecological modernization. National Association of Scientists. Monthly scientific journal, 2015, no 14, pp. 12-17. (In Russ.)
  • Matveev V. A. The fight against climate change — a new arena of confrontation between China and the USA. China in world and regional politics. History and modernity, 2021, no 26, pp. 37-351. (In Russ.)
  • Merzlyakov A. A. Assessment of the state of the domestic management system: the results of sociological monitoring. Russia reforming: yearbook: iss. 20. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov; FNISTC RAS. Moscow, 2022, p. 80. (In Russ.)
  • Minyaeva D. D. Ecologization of the economy in China. Conflictology. Nota bene, 2016, no 1, pp. 24-38. (In Russ.)
  • Mozias P. M. Environmental policy in China or up the ladder leading down? 2016. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekologicheskaya-politika-v-kitae-vverh....
  • Mol A. The environmental movement in an era of ecological modernization. Geoforum 31. Elsevier Science Ltd., 2000, vol. 31, Febr., pp. 45-56.
  • Pimenova P. D. Ecological Code of the Russian Federation: myth or the future. New Legal Bulletin, 2021, no 9 (33), pp. 41-52. (In Russ.)
  • Subbotin A. K. Global crisis and ecology: Mechanisms of disaster containment in Europe, Russia and the USA. Actual problems of Europe, 2014, no 1, pp. 12-48. (In Russ.)
  • Yanitsky O. N. Ecosocial Research: Interdisciplinary Methodology, Theory, Practice. Moscow, Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2016. (In Russ.)
  • Qin Tingting. Environmental policy of the People‘s Republic of China at the present stage. Theories and problems ofpolitical research, 2017, vol. 6, no 2A, pp. 283-298.